Legislature(2003 - 2004)
2003-05-05 House Journal
Full Journal pdf2003-05-05 House Journal Page 1320 SB 105 The following was read the second time: CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 105(HES) am(efd fld) "An Act relating to eligibility requirements for medical assistance for certain children, pregnant women, and persons in a medical or intermediate care facility." with the: Journal Page HES RPT HCS(HES) NT 1DP 1DNP 4NR 1066 TECHNICAL TITLE CHANGE 1066 FN2: (HSS) 1067 FIN RPT HCS(HES) NT 5DP 2DNP 1NR 2AM 1234 TECHNICAL TITLE CHANGE 1234 FN1: (HSS) 1235 Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that the following committee substitute be adopted in lieu of the original bill: HOUSE CS FOR CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 105(HES) "An Act relating to eligibility requirements for medical assistance for certain children, pregnant women, and persons in a medical or intermediate care facility; and providing for an effective date." (technical title change) 2003-05-05 House Journal Page 1321 There being no objection, it was so ordered. Amendment No. 1 was offered by Representative Croft: Page 1, lines 1 - 2 (title amendment): Delete ", pregnant women," Page 4, line 27, through page 5, line 10: Delete all material. Page 5, lines 11 - 14: Delete "household consists of nine persons or more [200 PERCENT OF THE FEDERAL POVERTY LINE AS DEFINED BY THE FEDERAL OFFICE OF MANAGEMENT AND BUDGET AND REVISED UNDER 42 U.S.C. 9902(2)]" Insert "200 percent of the federal poverty line as defined by the federal office of management and budget and revised under 42 U.S.C. 9902(2)" Representative Croft moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 1 be adopted. Representative Hawker objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 1 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: HCS CSSB 105(HES) Second Reading Amendment No. 1 YEAS: 16 NAYS: 22 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Anderson, Berkowitz, Crawford, Croft, Gara, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Joule, Kerttula, Kookesh, Kott, Lynn, Masek, Morgan, Moses, Weyhrauch Nays: Chenault, Coghill, Dahlstrom, Fate, Foster, Gatto, Harris, Hawker, Heinze, Holm, Kohring, McGuire, Meyer, Ogg, Rokeberg, Samuels, Seaton, Stoltze, Whitaker, Williams, Wilson, Wolf 2003-05-05 House Journal Page 1322 Excused: Cissna, Kapsner And so, Amendment No. 1 was not adopted. Amendment No. 2 was offered by Representative Kerttula: Page 4, line 27, following "two persons": Delete ";" Insert "or" Page 4, line 28, following "alone": Delete "is considered to be a household of two persons" Page 5, line 31, following "two persons": Delete ";" Insert "or" Page 6, line 1, following "alone": Delete "is considered to be a household of two persons" Representative Kerttula moved and asked unanimous consent that Amendment No. 2 be adopted. Representative Hawker objected. The Speaker stated that, without objection, the House would recess until 5:00 p.m.; and so, the House recessed at 12:45 p.m. SB 105 The following was before the House in second reading with Amendment No. 2 moved and pending: 2003-05-05 House Journal Page 1323 HOUSE CS FOR CS FOR SENATE BILL NO. 105(HES) "An Act relating to eligibility requirements for medical assistance for certain children, pregnant women, and persons in a medical or intermediate care facility; and providing for an effective date." Representative Hawker withdrew the objection. Representative Gatto objected. The question being: "Shall Amendment No. 2 be adopted?" The roll was taken with the following result: HCS CSSB 105(HES) Second Reading Amendment No. 2 YEAS: 18 NAYS: 18 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 2 Yeas: Berkowitz, Chenault, Crawford, Croft, Gara, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Hawker, Joule, Kerttula, Kookesh, Kott, Masek, Moses, Ogg, Samuels, Williams, Wolf Nays: Anderson, Coghill, Dahlstrom, Fate, Foster, Gatto, Harris, Heinze, Holm, Kohring, Lynn, Meyer, Morgan, Rokeberg, Seaton, Stoltze, Whitaker, Wilson Excused: Cissna, Kapsner Absent: McGuire, Weyhrauch And so, Amendment No. 2 was not adopted. **Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that Representative Kerttula be excused from a call of the House from 5:45 p.m. to 8:30 p.m., today. There being no objection, it was so ordered. Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that HCS CSSB 105(HES) be considered engrossed, advanced to third reading, and placed on final passage. There being no objection, it was so ordered. HCS CSSB 105(HES) was read the third time. 2003-05-05 House Journal Page 1324 The question being: "Shall HCS CSSB 105(HES) pass the House?" The roll was taken with the following result: HCS CSSB 105(HES) Third Reading Final Passage YEAS: 27 NAYS: 11 EXCUSED: 2 ABSENT: 0 Yeas: Anderson, Chenault, Coghill, Dahlstrom, Fate, Foster, Gatto, Harris, Hawker, Heinze, Holm, Kohring, Kott, Lynn, McGuire, Meyer, Morgan, Ogg, Rokeberg, Samuels, Seaton, Stoltze, Weyhrauch, Whitaker, Williams, Wilson, Wolf Nays: Berkowitz, Crawford, Croft, Gara, Gruenberg, Guttenberg, Joule, Kerttula, Kookesh, Masek, Moses Excused: Cissna, Kapsner And so, HCS CSSB 105(HES) passed the House. Representative Coghill moved and asked unanimous consent that the roll call on the passage of the bill be considered the roll call on the effective date clause. There being no objection, it was so ordered. HCS CSSB 105(HES) was referred to the Chief Clerk for engrossment. In the event the Senate fails to concur in the House amendment to CSSB 105(HES) am(efd fld), the Speaker appointed the following members to a Conference Committee to meet with a like Committee from the Senate to consider the bills: Representative Wilson, Chair Representative Coghill Representative Cissna